| Objectives
Principles
Newsletter
Board
Links
Contact
us |
 |
The Gallatin Wildlife Association
meets every Tuesday morning, 8:00 AM upstairs at the Community Food
Co-op in Bozeman. Feel free to join us, there's invariably much to
discuss.
Highlights
Gallatin Wildlife Association submits comments opposing renewal of the Gallatin National Forest's South Fork and Watkins Creek grazing allotments, in the West Yellowstone area. If cattle are allowed in these areas it will pose a major obstacle to our goal of wild buffalo in the Hebgen Lake Basin. Read comments submitted my GWA ...
Gallatin Wildlife Association submits comments on the Montana State Fish, Wildlife, and Parks/IBMP proposal for wild, free ranging bison in the Gardiner Basin. We are advocating that bison entering the Gardiner Basin not be hazed, slaughtered, and held in capture facilities. Read comments submitted by GWA ...
- US
Forest Service designates bighorn sheep as Sensitive Species,
In
February, 2010 the Gallatin Wildlife Association petitioned Region
1 of the Forest Service to designate Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep
as a sensitive species, and recently (February 2011) they agreed!
Sensitive status will direct National Forests to emphasize protection
of bighorns in their management decisions.
In its petition, Gallatin Wildlife
cited eleven reasons to provide sensitive status for bighorns.
These included:
- Montana bighorns are absent from
most of their historic range, persisting mostly in small, isolated
herds.
- Of 46 bighorn herds in Montana,
59% are below the state minimum standard of 125 animals for
a viable population; 37% are below management objectives; 35%
have objectives below the minimum viable standard; 46% have
suffered one or more dieoffs since 1984; whereas only 11 herds
exceed 200 animals.
- There are numerous threats to persistence
of Montana bighorns. These include disease from contact with
domestic sheep or goats, highway mortalities, and conifer encroachment
that degrades bighorn habitat.
- Genetics of Montana bighorn are
largely unknown, posing threats of inbreeding in small populations
and loss of genetic diversity and evolutionary potential to
respond to changing environments.
- Montana policy always places a
higher priority on agricultural production than on wildlife
restoration. This limits opportunities to maintain and enhance
Montana bighorn herds.
Designation of bighorn sheep as a
sensitive species will focus Forest Service efforts to enhance
bighorn populations on our public lands, in accordance with Forest
Service mandates to maintain diversity of native wildlife on our
National Forests.
- HB
482 killed in House Fish, "Wildlife", and Parks committee,
2/18/11
The Montana Wild Buffalo Recovery and Conservation Act was killed
on a strict party-line vote yesterday. Glenn sent out a very good
summary last night, which I'll include below. Briefly though, ironies
abound, as the Chairman of this committee is former GWA Board member
Ted Washburn.
And now, Glenn's report:
The Montana Wild Buffalo Conservation
and Management Act of 2011 was heard this afternoon in the House
FWP Committee. We had a great hearing with a diverse and substantial
showing of proponents so large that many did not get to say much
more than their name, affiliation and support for the bill. There
were only 3 opponents that spoke Tim Ravndal, Jay Bodner with the
Montana Stockgrowers Association and some gal from the Montana Farm
Bureau. Proponents included the FWP, CSKT tribal representatives,
hunters, landowners in both the Gardiner and West Yellowstone areas,
business owners from both Gardiner and West Yellowstone, an outfitter
and large landowner (Dome Mountain Ranch), a farmer/Agricultural
Entrepreneur, one livestock producer, various individuals, Zoo Montana,
and a variety of conservation groups including but not limited to
GWA, MWF, Helena Hunters and Anglers, BFC, GYC, YBF, WWF, TWCS,
NRDC, NPCA and I probably forgot some. There was also a lot of support
sent in via email and call in testimony.
Unfortunately, I just got word that the bill died this evening
in the committee on a 14-6 vote. This speaks to the strangle hold
the MSGA and MFB have on the Republican Party. They sure didn’t
waste any time. However, I believe there was a photographer and
reporter from Bozeman Chronicle so there will likely be an article
in the paper tomorrow.
I want to thank everyone for their efforts in support of the
bison and in particular their support for this legislative effort.
Please take the time to thank Representative Mike Phillips mikephillips@montana.net
for drafting, introducing and proudly carrying this excellent
bill. He did an absolutely great job in his introductory testimony
as well as his closing statement and we could not have asked for
a better sponsor and Statesman - Thank you Mike.
Keep your heads up and like the bison, do not give up. FYI, a
Citizen Advisory Council is meeting next week at the Bozeman Public
Library (626 E. Main Street) in the large meeting room to discuss
options for improving current bison management. This meeting will
be facilitated by a professional facilitator and is open to everyone,
so please if you have an interest plan on attending.
Thanks,
Glenn
- GWA
is building broad-based support for the 2011 Wild Buffalo Recovery
and Conservation Act
The goals of this legislation are;
- Recognize buffalo
as “valued, native wildlife in the state of Montana.”
- Restore Montana
Fish, Wildlife and Parks as the primary agency responsible for
the management of wild bison including fair chase, public hunting.
- Insure private property
rights and livestock are protected, by maintaining cooperation
with the Department of Livestock at MCA 81-2-121 to prevent bison
from threatening private property.
- Repeal current law
which allows the government to enter private property without
landowner permission (MCA 81-2-120).
For additional information
about our bill click
here for a fact sheet or click
here for bill info from the Legislative website.
- \Gallatin
Wildlife Association is co-petitioner in Quarantine Bison Public
Trust lawsuit.
GWA is proud to join
in a lawsuit against the State of Montana for continued failure
to recognize wild bison as valued native wildlife.
Wildlife being held in the public trust is a fundamental tenet of
game management in this country, and the recent transfer of quarantine
survivor's offspring into private livestock sets an intolerably
dangerous precedent for wildlife in Montana. Along with the Buffalo
Field Campaign, Yellowstone
Buffalo Foundation, and Western
Watersheds Project we strongly feel the State of Montana needs
to live up to earlier promises to manage at least a portion of quarantine
survivors as public wildlife on public lands in Montana. We have
long-standing suggestions that completely protect private property
rights, reduce risk of disease transmission, and turn the situation
into an enormous asset.
We regret the situation has come to this, but we will not tolerate
this continued erosion of public trust.
You can download
the complaint here.
- Let's
not waste an outstanding Montana Bison Conservation Opportunity!
by
GWA Board member Jim Bailey;
Two converging projects of Fish, Wildlife & Parks provide an
exceptional opportunity for wildlife conservation, and economic
development, in Montana. FWP seeks a home for about 90 disease-free
bison coming out of quarantine pens near Yellowstone Park; and FWP
is considering renewal of a cattle-grazing lease on the Robb/Ledford
Wildlife Management Area south of Alder.
About 90 bison must come out of the
quarantine pens in the next few months. Another 40-80 bison will
become available later in 2010. These animals are as free of Brucella
as can be determined. During 3 to 4 years in the pens, they have
been tested far more often than any cattle in Montana.
In 2006, at the start of the quarantine
study, FWP expressed its preference for ultimately locating these
Yellowstone bison to “suitable public lands in Montana”.
At the time, FWP “anticipated several opportunities for bison
restoration in Montana” and stated that it was “working
with potential cooperators to identify release sites”. Now,
over 3 years later, FWP seems unable to find Montana public lands
for establishing public-trust wild bison. In fact, last year’s
proposal was to ship bison to Wyoming. (more...)
- GWA
Comments on Robb-Ledford Wildlife Management Area EA
Glenn Hockett prepared
the following in-depth
scientific analysis of the effect of livestock grazing on our
our "Wildlife" Management Area.
- Robb-Ledford
Wildlife Management Area tour,
On September 9, 2009 GWA Board members Jim Bailey, Paul Griffin,
Jim Wisman and Glenn Hockett toured the Robb-Ledford WMA, where
domestic livestock use seems to be the priority, over native wildlife.
These practices are currently under review.
The 28,097-acre Robb-Ledford Wildlife Management Area, an important
elk and big game winter range, lies on the east side of the Snowcrest
mountains, south of Alder. It was purchased in 1987 by the Rocky
Mountain Elk Foundation for $1.82 million supported by a $500,000
donation from Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. RMEF transferred the
property to the FWP in 1988 for $1.99 million of Sportsmen’s
dollars (Habitat Montana - HB 526). This was the first major habitat
purchase of the RMEF and the first major acquisition of the FWP
with Habitat Montana funds. The Robb-Ledford WMA provides important
habitat for a variety of native fish, wildlife and plants, including
sensitive species such as westslope cutthroat trout, sage grouse
and basin big sagebrush. This was a significant habitat purchase
and was celebrated by sportsmen in Montana as well as nation-wide.
(more...)
- Bison
Shipment: a Sad Day for Montana
<the
following op-ed by GWA Board member Jim Bailey recently ran in the
Bozeman Chronicle>
It’s a sad day for Montana when 41 of our disease-free bison
are shipped to Wyoming because Montana stockgrowers have the political
clout to block reintroduction of this native wild animal in our
own state. There are no wild bison year-round in Montana, anywhere.
So far, all we have
are empty promises from Fish, Wildlife and Parks regarding efforts
to find a home for native bison in Montana. A sampling of comments
in a June 2006 FWP decision notice follows: (1) “FWP has identified
the restoration of bison to prairie habitats in Montana as an objective
in its comprehensive wildlife plan.” (2) FWP “anticipates
several opportunities for bison restoration projects in Montana
and will prefer relocating bison to a site in Montana.” (3)
“There are several suitable properties within Montana where
bison could be managed as wildlife.” (4) FWP believes that
“the time is appropriate for bison restoration both within
the Greater Yellowstone Area and in other suitable habitats.”
(5) FWP is “working with potential cooperators to identify
suitable release sites” and FWP is “discussing this
project with potential cooperators” (in 2006).
Was FWP just blowing
smoke? More likely, the political power of Montana stockgrowers,
expressed through “their” governor has squelched the
good intentions of FWP. In 1896, buffalo hunter Vic Smith said,
“The stockmen wanted the bison exterminated so the cattle
could have the grass.” Not much has changed. It’s not
about brucellosis, it’s about grass, even the grass on our
public lands.
-
- Montana
Wild Buffalo Recovery and Conservation Act of 2009.
<Update:
Our bill was killed in the House FWP Committee. To read more click
here.>
For an excellent summary, Montana's
Choice, comparing the existing situation to what we propose,
click here.
GWA is building broad-based support for a legislative solution to
Montana's current bison management debacle. Rather than attempt
to manage wildlife as livestock, our bill;
- Designates bison as “Valued,
Native Wildlife in the State of Montana.”
- Designates Montana Fish, Wildlife
and Parks as the agency responsible for the management of wild
bison including fair chase, public hunting.
- Continue to insure that private property
rights and Montana’s valued livestock brucellosis free status
are protected, by maintaining cooperation with the Department
of Livestock via MCA 81-2-121.
Here is how you can help:
Please let your local legislator know about your support for HB253
by calling 406-444-4800. Montana hunters, landowners, outfitters,
local communities, wildlife advocates and other concerned citizens
are joining together to ensure their elected officials know we value
wild bison as treasured native wildlife.
For more information contact:
- Glenn Hockett, Gallatin Wildlife
Association, Bozeman, MT
glhockett@bresnan.net
or 406-586-1729
- Karrie Taggart, Horse Butte Neighbors
of Bison (HOBNOB), West Yellowstone, MT, karrietaggart@yahoo.com
or 406-646-5140
- Jim "JB" Klyap, Dome Mountain
Ranch, Emigrant, MT
jim@domemountainranch.com
or 406-333-4361
- GWA
Comment on the Royal Teton Ranch grazing restriction and bison "access"
agreement. GWA
board member Jim Bailey provided this very succinct assessment of
the myriad failings of the RTR deal.
I have to quote from his last paragraph; "The Gallatin Wildlife
Association believes that, from bluebirds to bison, we are all responsible
for our part in conserving diverse wildlife communities for ourselves
and future generations."
- Brucellosis
laws need updating The
Bozeman Daily Chronicle carried GWA Board member Jim Wisman's following
editorial. (Jimmy wrote this by hand,
in one take! It sums the situation as well as I've seen).
- Myths
of Bison Management and Brucellosis in Montana
An excellent summation by Jim Bailey, that requires a page
of its own.
- Yellowstone
Park violating their own policy GWA
Board member and retired biologist Jim Bailey wrote the following
editorial;
- With all the furor over slaughter of 1600 bison from Yellowstone
National Park, we are overlooking a serious issue. The Interagency
Bison Management Plan and Yellowstone Superintendent Lewis are
violating mandates and policies of the National Park Service.
Congress mandates retaining Park resources “in their
natural conditions” and leaving them “unimpaired
for future generations.” Park Service policy is to “maintain
processes of naturally evolving ecosystems” and to minimize
“human interference with evolving genetic diversity.”
It is likely that genetic diversity of the Park’s bison
was lost to slaughtering in 2008. Moreover, natural selection
has largely been replaced by human intervention. Coevolution
of the Park’s animals, plants and microorganisms has
been sidetracked, along with bison adaptation to their physical
environment.
Coevolution of bison and Brucella abortus has proceeded for
about 100 years in Yellowstone. There is some evidence of
resistance to brucellosis in bison already. With progress
in genetic engineering, genes for resistance to brucellosis
might one day be transferred to livestock; but only if we
allow natural selection to proceed in the Park.
The Interagency Bison Management Plan is a dangerous precedent,
subverting the purposes established for natural areas within
National Parks. We are converting bison to livestock, and
making the Park more like just another theme park.
- CUT
deal is expensive non-solution for bison
The Billings
Gazette ran the following editorial by GWA Board member Joe
Gutkoski about the recent Church Universal and Triumphant grazing
buyout;
- Yellowstone National Park agreed on April 19 to a down payment
of $1.8 million to the Church Universal and Triumphant plus
additional payments of $76,500 a year for 20 years, totaling
$3.3 million for a 30-year narrow bison corridor easement and
the removal of CUT's small, recently acquired herd of cattle.
This would allow 25 bison, tested and fitted with neck and
vaginal electronic transmitters, to walk the easement and
keep the bison from acting like wildlife. They must obey the
impossible strictures of the Stockgrowers Written Interagency
Bison Management Plan and to stay within its restrictive Zones
1, 2 and 3 boundaries.
We are paying $3.3 million twice for a single easement along
a Park County road that has a public right of way. Why do
four nongovernment organizations and a seriously misled governor
support this deal?
It is to mask the fact that our governor has allowed the
elimination of 1,600 bison in 2008 on his watch - more than
at any time since the later 1800s.
It perpetuates a falsehood that bison are being allowed to
widely roam in Montana.
It is a ruse to brag that adoptive management is practiced
under the IBMP.
It is a public relations stunt to divide and quiet the questioners.
To hide the fact that the population is below 2,500 bison
within YNP.
The $3.3 million deal supports and reinforces the Stockgrowers
IBMP.
The deal will lead to bison slaughter in the future and does
nothing for a solution.
|
|